Federal Complaint Filed Over Denial of Education Benefits

Retired Navy Commander Files Federal Complaint Over Denial of Education Benefits

Washington, D.C. – February 4, 2025 – A retired U.S. Navy Commander with nearly three decades of service has filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00324) against the Acting Secretary of the Navy, challenging the denial of Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits for his children.

The complaint alleges that the Commander, who was eligible for reserve retirement as of 2008, was improperly denied the right to transfer education benefits due to errors by the Navy and inadequate counseling regarding eligibility requirements. Despite fulfilling all criteria outlined by Department of Defense and Navy regulations, he was misinformed that additional years of service were required. Acting on this misinformation, the Commander extended his service commitment but later retired in 2015 to address urgent family needs, including supporting a child with autism enrolled in the Navy’s Exceptional Family Member Program.

The lawsuit claims the denial of benefits was arbitrary, capricious, and inconsistent with established military regulations and past Board for Correction of Naval Records precedents. The Commander asserts that other service members in similar situations were granted relief and that his case deserves the same outcome.

“This case is about ensuring fairness for service members who have dedicated their lives to this country and holding the Navy accountable for fulfilling its commitments to military families,” said a Dylan Thayer the Commander’s legal representative.

The complaint asks the Court to remand the case for a new review, recognize the Commander’s eligibility to transfer education benefits, and correct his military records to reflect that eligibility. The case is being handled by the Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC, a firm specializing in military justice and veterans’ rights.

Media Contact:
Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, PLLC
Tel: (202) 546-9575
Contact Us

Disclaimer:

The information provided in this press release is for general educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal representation. Service members facing legal or administrative challenges should consult with a qualified attorney who is experienced in military law to receive guidance tailored to their specific circumstances.

Filing against Navy for Wrongful Death of a Marine Corps Poolee Ordered to Drive While Impaired by Illness

Press Release: The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon File Suit Against the Department of the Navy for the Wrongful Death of a Marine Corps Poolee Ordered to Drive While Impaired by Illness.

Law Offices of David P. Sheldon PLLC

100 M St SE, Suite 600

Washington, DC 20003

(202) 546 9575

www.militarydefense.com

Read the Complaint Here

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon File Suit Against the Department of the Navy for the Wrongful Death of a Marine Corps Poolee Ordered to Drive While Impaired by Illness.

For nearly a decade, Tyler Gergler dreamed of following his parents’ legacy of service in the Marine Corps. When he turned 18, he was finally able to realize that dream, by joining the Delayed Entry Program, in preparation for active-duty service in the Corps. Delayed Entry Program members, or “poolees” enlist in the Marine Corps, but, as the title states, have their entry delayed so that they may participate in a physical training program to prepare them for boot camp. They remain, until entry, with their families, though also under the orders of their recruiters.

A month and a half later, on July 26th, 2019, Tyler was very ill and had been throwing up for nearly 16 hours. Via text, his recruiters ordered him to make the drive from southern Maryland to Colt’s Neck New Jersey for a social event the next day. When he notified his recruiters of how sick he was, they ordered him to drive anyway, and stated that he could be discharged for failing to show. Under this overwhelming pressure, Tyler obeyed his noncommissioned officers’ orders. Less than an hour and a half later, on a beautiful summer afternoon, Tyler died when, for no reason, his car veered off the road and crashed into the highway guard rail. There were no drugs or alcohol in his system, nor were there any conditions on the road that could have caused the accident.

Tyler’s grieving parents, Jason Gergler and Raynu Clark, received not a single benefit from the Marine Corps. No life insurance, no funeral support, and, disgracefully, not even a flag or letter of appreciation for their son’s service. The Corps’ position was that Tyler had died while driving to stay with family that night, and thus had not died in the service of the United States. They were left with nothing but Tyler’s memory.

The Law Offices of David P. Sheldon, alongside local counsel, have filed suit in the District of New Jersey, to correct this. Clark and Gergler v. The Honorable Carlos Del Toro, 2:22-cv-2586, illustrates the egregious and negligent conduct of Tyler’s recruiters, and the way they knowingly ordered a severely ill young Marine to drive.

This suit is not only to help compensate Mr. Gergler and Ms. Clark for the death of their son, but also to effect real change within Marine Corps recruitment practices. Tyler’s parents want to ensure that the Marine Corps will put in place the policy changes needed to ensure that no other parents have to suffer the same tragedy.

 

 

printable version